A few words of explanation...

The page was created quickly to present something at registration to Paradigm Drift #6. As a result, there may be many inconsistencies and ambiguities, which will be continuously addressed. If something is unclear or you notice any errors in the logic of this theory, please contact me via email. Also I will add new content to this page as I have time to do so. :-)

This theory is the result of approximately 30 years of reflection and verification against currently known scientific facts. By "facts," I mean things that are CONFIRMED through experiments or observations. Although there are many currently accepted theories that are supposedly confirmed, in my opinion—and that of many scientists whose voices do not break through to mainstream scientific discussions—many of them are false or simply unbelievably absurd. This does not prevent their continued promotion in the so-called scientific mainstream.

Introduction

The theory challenges conventional scientific paradigms by proposing alternative interpretations of established concepts, aiming to resolve inconsistencies in current models. It emphasizes the importance of empirical validation and encourages open-minded inquiry into the mysteries of the Universe that surrounds us.

Understanding the basics of this theory does not require advanced knowledge of elementary particles, quantum physics, optics, electromagnetic phenomena, or other complex physical laws. However, a certain academic level of understanding in these areas is necessary. Theoretically, knowledge at the level of a high school education is sufficient... a better high school, that is. :-)

To begin, you must accept 'as is' few fundamental assumptions for this theory:

• 1. Time as a dimension does not exist!! It is our perception of changes in the surrounding reality that has created the mistaken notion of time as something "real." Time is a relative quantity, much like velocity, for example. To define velocity, we need reference points. Without them, such as in complete emptiness, we would be unable to determine whether we are moving at all. The same applies to "time," for which we need a "reference," such as a device that counts or performs a specific action at a set interval of events (e.g., a full orbit of the Earth around the Sun). Without such a "reference," our perception of time would be entirely different.(!!) A more detailed explanation will follow in the later part of this work.


• 2. The entire Universe is filled with particles. THERE IS NO SUCH THING as truly empty space. In our perception, "empty space" is a vacuum, which in fact is not empty. Because the so-called "void" is incapable of transmitting wave phenomena.(!!) This can, in a sense, be related to the old theory of the Ether. A fuller explanation will also follow in the later part.


• 3. The Universe has a finite size, although from our perspective, it may seem infinite. More importantly... the entire Universe is under a certain "pressure." We can compare this to an inflated balloon, where the rubber of the balloon exerts pressure on the air inside it. THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT ASSUMPTION!! And you must accept it as an axiom. As for the shape of the Universe, it is certainly not a "balloon." Rather, it is something akin to a Möbius strip, except we are "twisting" 3D space, not 2D as in the strip. Such a "twist" immediately implies the existence of a 4th PHYSICAL dimension. (!!) In this theory, this dimension helps explain many physical phenomena. (!!)


• 4. There is only ONE fundamental force.(!!) And that is MOMENTUM. And there is only ONE fundamental particle that forms this "Ether" of ours. We will call this particle the "0-particle" (in words: zero-particle). Its mass is close to zero, but it is certainly not zero, unlike, for example, the absurd assumption of the Higgs Boson, which additionally creates some extra fields and other nonsense. Zero mass = zero momentum. This means that ANY COLLISION of two particles with (theoretically) zero mass WOULD PRODUCE NO EFFECT. Because they would exert no force on each other. And this fundamentally contradicts the BASIC laws of physics.(!!) All of this stems from the foolish assumption that a moving particle "magically" transforms into "magical" energy. And NO ONE BOTHERS TO EXPLAIN what this "energy" is! For example, what is this "energy"? This "magic" can be likened to the quote from the Star Wars movie: "Use the Force, Luke." :-) Paper will accept ANYTHING, but physics deals with PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. Therefore, to transfer "energy" during a collision, a mass greater than "zero" is required. HOWEVER... if all particles have the same mass (m), then this mass can be REDUCED in the equations. And then we are left with this "pure energy." Which, upon "collision" with another mass (other than the reduced one), will manifest as "mass" during measurements. (This is one of the more difficult things to explain in this theory. A detailed explanation will be provided in a separate chapter of this work.)


• 5. (Added later) more will be added later.

Chapter 1: The Nature of Reality

This chapter explores the foundational concepts of Piotr Szopinski's theory, focusing on how physical laws define the structure of the universe. It delves into the interplay of matter, energy, and spacetime, proposing a unified perspective on reality.

Chapter 2: Fundamental Forces

Here, we discuss the four fundamental forces—gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear—and their roles in Szopinski's framework. The chapter examines how these forces govern interactions at both cosmic and subatomic scales.

Chapter 3: Quantum Interactions

This section covers the quantum aspects of Szopinski's theory, including particle-wave duality and quantum entanglement. It proposes novel interpretations of how quantum interactions contribute to the macroscopic world we observe.